You're here: Home - TV Newsroom - Sky News: No Extended Coverage Overnight

Sky News: No Extended Coverage Overnight

This topic contains 3 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by Dotdotuk dotdotuk 13 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Kelly
    Kelly
    Member

    They started getting a video from the area around 23:00, the rescue was continueing through the night and there was still breaking news and it was important so why no extended coverage with 2 presenters and the newswall as they have done for important news at other times?

    #18698 Reply
    Forum Member
    Forum Member
    Member

    because in comparison to things like starvation in sudan (although rarely mentioned) this is not big important news

    #18699 Reply
    Dotdotuk
    dotdotuk
    Member

    Actually it pains me to say it as I have watched Sky News since the good old days ( Chisolm, Mann, Calister, Scott, Glencourse et al ) but Sky were awful covering the Boscastle flood.

    ITV NC and BBC 24 were miles ahead. I realise that they have local newsrooms but I remember Jeremy breaking the news during Live At Five yet they did not have live pictures when I went to bed at about 23:30

    #18700 Reply
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Reply To: Sky News: No Extended Coverage Overnight
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <del datetime=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">