You're here: Home - Forums - Green Room - Paedophiles Login | Register

Paedophiles

This topic contains 21 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Vane101 vane101 12 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
  • Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    A lot has been reported by the news about paedophiles.

    So why also are they not including Men & Women that have sex with minors, even if the child is 15 years and 364 days old and the other is 16 this is still illegal.

    I have seen in the past two years family’s of children as young as 11 a case of an 11, 13 and 17 year old that has mothered children, some of them 2 before the age of 16.

    This was in a national newspaper, it’s one of thousands of under 16 year olds that fall pregnant.

    A teacher who was female infact 2 were prosecuted for having a relatioship with minors, it seemed to fizzle away.

    I don’t hear of or read about any prosecutions or jail terms when a Man or Woman that is a major having sex with a minor.

    #19699
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    Paedophillia is different to consenting intercourse, underage or not.

    #32668
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 17 2006, 05:03 PM(daved2424 @ Jan 17 2006, 05:03 PM)

    Paedophillia is different to consenting intercourse, underage or not.

    Not it isn’t, a person over 16 having sex with or holding lude images of a child under 16 is paedophilia.

    #32669
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    Yes, but is a different degree.

    #32670
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 17 2006, 10:57 PM(daved2424 @ Jan 17 2006, 10:57 PM)

    Yes, but is a different degree.

    No, it’s an adult having underaged sexual intercourse.

    It’s paedophilia, no different degree the adult should know better.

    #32671
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    So if I have sex with a girl of 15 tonight, who claims she is 16 and is consenting, is the same as me downloading thousands of images of young children, maybe even toddlers, and assaulting, and perhaps even raping, the odd one here or there? Get a grip.

    #32672
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 18 2006, 10:51 AM(daved2424 @ Jan 18 2006, 10:51 AM)

    So if I have sex with a girl of 15 tonight, who claims she is 16 and is consenting, is the same as me downloading thousands of images of young children, maybe even toddlers, and assaulting, and perhaps even raping, the odd one here or there? Get a grip.

    Yes having sex with a minor is rape and means if you’re an adult then you are behaving as a paedophile.

    If you download indecent images of children then you should be jailed also.

    I did not start this thread on downloading paedophilic images.

    If you wish to start such a thread then off you go and type, don’t change the subject of the thread, Trolls are not welcome.

    #32673
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    Right this isn’t difficult to get. You started off the topic asking why they recieve different levels of coverage, I responded by explaining the different levels of paedophillia and explaing why different stories recieve different levels of coverage.

    You are viewing paedophillia with blinkers on. All paedophillia is illegal and I do not dispute that, but what I am saying is there are different levels of sickness when it come to paedophilles.

    You also mention “behaving as a paedophille”. Yes, in the scenario I presented you are “behaving as a paedophille” but you are not knowingly, and to the very best of your knowledge, committing a crime. That is why this scenario is far less sicking as child rape and is why different levels of media coverage are given.

    Is that simple enough now?

    #32674
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    A paedophile is a paedophile.

    Any one that aquires indecent images of minors for their self gratification or has illegal sex with a minor is a paedophile.

    There is no level, that is making excuses.

    #32675
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    Thank god you are not a judge or a tv news producer.

    #32676
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 18 2006, 09:37 PM(daved2424 @ Jan 18 2006, 09:37 PM)

    Thank god you are not a judge or a tv news producer.

    You should not show disrespect to your creator, it’s G-d.

    You may have set your morals lower than a sewer pipe, don’t expect everyone to behave how Dogs behave.

    If there were more people like myself running this country and sitting as magistrates or wigged judges, this country and society would be a better more tolerant society.

    Paedophilia is never to be tolerated.

    #32677
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    1. God is not my creator, so please do not preach your religion to me. I do not preach mine to you and I would appreciate it if you did the same.

    2. Not once, have I ever, ever, EVER said on this thread that paedophillia is acceptable. If you just opened you bloody eyes and read what I have been trying to say you would realise I have being trying to explain the answer to your question. If you look even closer, you will even notice that I have not even said I agree with the reasoning of the different coverage levels.

    3. My morals are not communicated to you through this thread.

    4. Please refrain from personal insults on a matter that you may believe you dissagree with me on, but in fact cannot tell because I have not actually expressed it here.

    5. I have never once said paedophillia should be tolerated.

    6. THINK before you TYPE.

    #32678
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 19 2006, 12:13 AM(daved2424 @ Jan 19 2006, 12:13 AM)

    1. God is not my creator, so please do not preach your religion to me. I do not preach mine to you and I would appreciate it if you did the same.

    2. Not once, have I ever, ever, EVER said on this thread that paedophillia is acceptable. If you just opened you bloody eyes and read what I have been trying to say you would realise I have being trying to explain the answer to your question. If you look even closer, you will even notice that I have not even said I agree with the reasoning of the different coverage levels.

    3. My morals are not communicated to you through this thread.

    4. Please refrain from personal insults on a matter that you may believe you dissagree with me on, but in fact cannot tell because I have not actually expressed it here.

    5. I have never once said paedophillia should be tolerated.

    6. THINK before you TYPE.

    Quit being a moron.

    I am agnostic.

    You say paedophilia has different levels.

    I do think before I type.

    I don’t insult.

    I do think before I type.

    #32679
    Daved2424
    daved2424
    Participant

    This has got to be a wind up.

    #32680
    Lee Smith
    Lee Smith
    Participant

    daved2424+Jan 19 2006, 12:36 PM(daved2424 @ Jan 19 2006, 12:36 PM)

    This has got to be a wind up.

    You feel wound up, do you have something to hide?

    I wonder why we have the highest teenage pregnancy rate in Western europe; I wonder why there are 11 year old girls giving birth to babies fathered by adults?

    No morals and laws not implemented.

    #32681
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.