Michael Jackson Trial

Discussions on news and breaking news events including, BBC News, ITV News, Sky News
rob237
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:33 pm

Post by rob237 » Fri Mar 25, 2005 12:36 am

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/nevercoppedafeel.htmlhttp://www.ebaumsworld.com/nevercoppedafeel.html>

kev667
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 5:24 pm

Post by kev667 » Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:37 am

Breaking news:



The judge in the Jackson trial will ALLOW past allegations as evidence.



Jordy Chandler will take the stand.




daffodil
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:34 pm

Post by daffodil » Sun Apr 03, 2005 7:49 am

if m/j is found guilty i will destroy cd s of him,he and j/king are a disgrace.

calciofan
Posts: 132
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:34 am

Post by calciofan » Tue Apr 26, 2005 8:14 pm

Eh I don't get it! How many times have Sky changed the presenter for their MJ reconstruction programme?



Yes I know it's been quite a long trial so far but I think they could swapped between two presenters rather than the four right now!



Colin Brazier, Jayne Secker, Jonathan Samuels and now hey've got Barbara Serra (who I thought was in Italy last week).



On another note, I've got to say Barbara's reporting in Rome (and in Turin) during the last month has been absolutely first class!

Newsroom
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:15 pm

Post by Newsroom » Tue May 10, 2005 8:21 pm

I think her presenting on the Jackson trial is also first class. She really is an excellent reporter/correspondent and wherever she's reporting from, she always does a top-quality job.

lovito
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:01 am

Post by lovito » Thu May 12, 2005 2:19 pm

SkyNewsAus+May 1 2004, 01:19 PM(SkyNewsAus @ May 1 2004, 01:19 PM)

Personally, I think he will get charged with all of those but I don't if he Really did them. All the media hype certainly makes me confused.



What does everyone else think? Guilty or Not Guilty?



Cheers,

SkyNewsAus






I am convinced that he did not do what he is accused of. Unfortunately we have a number of people who have made up their minds that he is guilty. The chief of them all is one of your reporters (the bearded one) at the court. He is so bias and seems to have lost all sense of fair journalism. He should be removed from the court.



Lovito

jj_17
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 3:49 pm

Post by jj_17 » Fri May 13, 2005 10:56 am

I am also convinced that MJ is not guilty. I mean, all of these employees saw a man molest a child yet not one of them said a thing to police, instead selling thier stories to taloids?! Rediculous. Not to mention that many of them owe Jackson money and tried to sue him. I totally agree with Macauley Culkin when he says that these allegations are 'absolutely rediculous'

edofis
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:23 pm

Post by edofis » Sun May 22, 2005 12:11 pm

I am convinced that there is a good Judge on this trial. He dosen't seem to take any nonsense. He is doing everything to ensure there isn't a miss-trial.

He's not dazzled by the glamour of it all.

I have always held a question mark over Jackson, but, as they say.. innocent until poven guilty.

jj_17
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 3:49 pm

Post by jj_17 » Mon May 30, 2005 5:02 pm

So, the trial is practically over. Just closing statements and jury deliberation left. And not only am I sure that Michael Jackson will be acquitted of all charges, I am also sure that he is innocent, not just 'getting off' due to lack of evidence.

I just hope Jackson listens to his advisers, family and friends in the future, and makes sure that nothing like this ever happens again.

scottish
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:42 am

Post by scottish » Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:24 pm

Martin Stanford in now in Santa Maria, along with Jayne Secker and Ian Dovaston.

Post Reply